Моральная экономика «хорошей жизни»: достоинство, признание и гендерные границы в условиях классового неравенства
Аннотация
В статье исследуется моральная экономика «хорошей жизни» в условиях постсоциалистического неравенства, с опорой на критическую моральную социологию. Анализ основан на полуструктурированных интервью с жителями Санкт-Петербурга и Ленинградской области (N = 60), чьи доходы выросли за последние годы, но социальное признание остается неустойчивым. Авторы показывают, как субъекты из разных социально-экономических групп конструируют моральную состоятельность через нарративы о труде, заботе и минимализме, артикулируя право на нормальность и достойную жизнь. Теоретическая рамка включает три ключевых понятия — достоинство, признание и моральную автономию — и позволяет описать стратегии моральной навигации в ситуации фрагментированного признания. Особое внимание уделяется гендерной структуре механизмов признания: маскулинность оформляется через трудовую этику и отказ от зависимости, тогда как феминность — через заботу, эмоциональную вовлеченность и респектабельность. Статья демонстрирует, как моральные категории становятся ресурсами повседневной субъектности, структурируя границы допустимого и механизмы социального различения в условиях нестабильности и ограниченного доступа к символическим ресурсам.Скачивания
Литература
Anderson E. (1999). What is the point of equality? // Ethics. Vol. 109. №2. Р. 287–337.
Baraitser L. (2009). Maternal Encounters: The Ethics of Interruption. Routledge.
Bauman Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boltanski L., Thévenot L. (2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press.
Butler J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
Connell R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cook L. J. (2011). Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460098
Duriesmith D. (2017). Masculinity and new war: The gendered dynamics of contemporary armed conflict. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561493
Eliasoph N. (2011). Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.10845
Fassin D. (2012). Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. University of California Press.
Fourcade M., Healy K. (2007). Moral views of market society // Annual Review of Sociology. № 33. Р. 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131642
Fraser N., Honneth A. (2003). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
Gillies V. (2007). Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working-Class Experiences of Parenting. Routledge.
Gilligan C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Graeber D. (2011). Debt: The First 5000 Years. Melville House.
Greig A. (2022). Men, masculinities & armed conflict: Findings from a four-country study (Research and Learning Series No. 19). Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF). https://www.wilpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Alan-Greig-Men-Masculinities-Armed-Conflict-Findings-from-a-four-country-study-WILPF-2022.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77954-2_103
Han C. (2012). Life in Debt: Times of Care and Violence in Neoliberal Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hays S. (1996). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. Yale University Press.
Hochschild A. R. (2003). The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520935167
Hochschild A. R. (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Honneth A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/089692059702300309
Lamont M. (2000). The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12rpt
Lamont M., Molnár V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences // Annual Review of Sociology. № 28. Р. 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Lamont M., Thévenot L. (Eds.). (2000). Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511628108
Lamont M., Welburn J. S., Fleming C. M. (2013). Responses to Discrimination and Social Resilience Under Neoliberalism: The United States Compared // Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era / P. A. Hall & M. Lamont (Eds.). Cambridge University Press. Р. 129–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139542425.009
Lareau A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/cdg.2421
Lister R. (2004). Poverty. Polity Press.
Messner M. A. (1992). Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mol A. (2008). The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.
Reay D. (2006). Doing the dirty work of social class? Mothers’ work in support of their children’s schooling // The Sociological Review. Vol. 53. № 3. Р. 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2005.00575.x
Ribbens McCarth, J., Edwards R., Gillies V. (2003). Making Families: Moral Tales of Parenting and Step-parenting. Durham: Sociology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315074634
Sandel M. J. (2009). The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2009.22.17
Sayer A. (2005). The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511734779
Seidler V. J. (2006). Transforming masculinities: Men, cultures, bodies, power, sex and love. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030554-9
Sevenhuijsen S. (1998). Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. Routledge.
Sherman R. (2017). Uneasy Street: The Anxieties of Affluence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.701.0134i
Skeggs B. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. SAGE.
Standing G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Theidon K. (2009). Reconstructing Masculinities: The Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration of Former Combatants in Colombia // Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 31. № 1. Р. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0053
Thévenot L. (2006). L'action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d'engagement. Paris: Éditions La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologies.3575
Tronto J. C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Verdery K. (1996). What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next? Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rnmm
Wacquant L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392255
Walker С. (2022). Remaking a “Failed” Masculinity: Working-Class Young Men, Breadwinning, and Morality in Contemporary Russia // Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. Vol. 29. № 4. P. 1474–1496. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac002
Walkerdine V., Lucey H., Melody J. (2001). Growing Up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350392793
Zavisca J. (2011). Housing the New Russia. Cornell University Press.
Zelizer V. A. (2010). Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2013.01.05
