Не только природные ресурсы: экстрактивизм как обобщающая концепция

  • Никита Панфилов МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, Ленинские горы, 1, Москва, 119991 Российская Федерация
  • Руслан Дохов Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»; МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, Ленинские горы, 1, Москва, 119991 Российская Федерация
Ключевые слова: материальность, экстрактивизм, зависимость, полимасштабность, постколониализм, ресурсы

Аннотация

Интенсификация воздействия человека на среду, прогрессирующее глобальное неравенство и обостряющееся противостояние ресурсной логике восприятия природы привели к оформлению в начале XXI века дискурса об экстрактивизме — особой форме общественных отношений, приводящей к превращению развития в эксплуатацию ресурса с отчуждением локальных акторов (сообществ, людей, компаний и даже государств) от производящейся прибыли, вывозимой с территории, где этот ресурс находится. Концепция экстрактивизма распространилась за пределы изначальной тематики (от природных к ресурсам человеческого таланта, данных, зеленого регулирования и мн. др.) и подверглась обильной и разнообразной рефлексии использовавших ее представителей разных дисциплин. Описанные на латиноамериканском материале практики были обнаружены в других частях света, в том числе в скрытых, мимикрирующих под экологически и социально ответственное развитие формах. Расширенная концепция экстрактивизма претендует на роль еще одного большого обобщающего множество процессов понятия, сводящего постмодерное развитие к обновляющему и цементирующему существующие социальные расколы производству ресурсных периферий не только на бывших колониальных окраинах, но и в староосвоенных ядрах стран развитого капитализма. Воображаемая пустота новых ресурсных хинтерландов стала новым механизмом исключения растущих уязвимых групп из распределения прибыли, производящейся в глобальных цепочках добавленной стоимости.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Литература

Антонова И.Ф. (1987). Типологические черты экономической географии стран переселенческого капитализма // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 5. География. № 3. С. 47–52. https://doi.org/10.17308/geo.2020.4/3069

Гидденс Э. (2003). Устроение общества: Очерк теории структурации. М.: Академический проект.

Деланда М. (2018). Новая философия общества: Теория ассамбляжей и социальная сложность. Пермь: Гиле Пресс.

Замятина Н.Ю. (1998). Зона освоения (фронтир) и ее образ в американской и русской культурах // Общественные науки и современность. № 5. С. 75–89.

Каганский В.Л. (2015). Внутренняя периферия — новая растущая зона культурного ландшафта России // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. № 6. С. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.7868/s0002332917040099

Ратцель Ф. (1898). Политическая география / Изложил Л.Д. Синицкий // Землеведение. Т. 5. № 3–4. С. 21–74.

Родоман Б.Б. (1976). Деформация растущих моноцентрических ареалов // Теоретические проблемы географии. Рига: ЛГУ. С. 78–89.

Смирнягин Л.В. (2019). Типология зарубежных стран. М.: Типография «Пеликан».

Харви Д. (2021). Состояние постмодерна: Исследование истоков культурных изменений. М.: ИД ВШЭ. https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2369-8

Agnew J. A. (1987). Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. London: Allen and Unwin

Agnew J. A. (2011). Space and place // Handbook of geographical knowledge. Р. 316–331.

Andrade D. (2022). Neoliberal extractivism: Brazil in the twenty-first century // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2030314

Andreucci D., Radhuber I. M. (2017). Limits to “counter-neoliberal” reform: Mining expansion and the marginalisation of post-extractivist forces in Evo Morales’s Bolivia // Geoforum. Vol. 84. P. 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.002

Artiga-Purcell J. A. (2022). Hydrosocial extractive territories: Gold, sugarcane and contested water politics in El Salvador // Geoforum. Vol. 131. P. 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.03.012

Ayelazuno J. A. (2014). The ‘new extractivism’ in Ghana: A critical review of its development prospects // The Extractive Industries and Society. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.04.008

Barney K. (2009). Laos and the making of a ‘relational’ resource frontier // Geographical Journal. Vol. 175. № 2. P. 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00323.x

Barrington-Leigh P. (2017). The Role of Subjective Well-Being as an Organizing Concept for Community Indicators / eds. M. Holden, R. Phillips, P. Stevens). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. P. 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6_2

Bennett M. M. (2016). Discursive, material, vertical, and extensive dimensions of post-Cold War Arctic resource extraction // Polar Geography. Vol. 39. № 4. P. 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937x.2016.1234517

Bennett T., Joyce P. (Eds.). (2013). Material powers: Cultural studies, history and the material turn. Routledge.

Bernauer W., Roth R. (2021). Protected areas and extractive hegemony: A case study of marine protected areas in the Qikiqtani (Baffin Island) region of Nunavut, Canada // Geoforum. Vol. 120. P. 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.011

Bisht A. (2021). Conceptualizing sand extractivism: Deconstructing an emerging resource frontier // The Extractive Industries and Society. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100904

Bledsoe A. (2019). Afro-Brazilian Resistance to Extractivism in the Bay of Aratu // Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Vol. 109. № 2. P. 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1506694

Brand U., Boos T., Brad A. (2017). Degrowth and post-extractivism: two debates with suggestions for the inclusive development framework // Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Vol. 24. P. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.007

Brand U., Görg C., Wissen M. (2020). Overcoming neoliberal globalization: social-ecological transformation from a Polanyian perspective and beyond // Globalizations. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1644708

Bresnihan P., Brodie P. (2021). New extractive frontiers in Ireland and the moebius strip of wind/data // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 1645–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620970121

Breyer B., Zipper S. C., Qiu J. (2018). Sociohydrological Impacts of Water Conservation under Anthropogenic Drought in Austin, TX (USA) // Water Resources Research. Vol. 54. № 4. P. 3062–3080. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021155

Bruna N. (2022). A climate-smart world and the rise of Green Extractivism // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 839–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2070482

Bruna N. (2023). The Rise of Green Extractivism: Extractivism, Rural Livelihoods and Accumulation in a Climate-Smart World. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351870

Chagnon C. W., Durante F., Gills B. K., Hagolani-Albov S. E., Hokkanen S., Kangasluoma S. M. J., Konttinen H., Kröger M., LaFleur W., Ollinaho O., Vuola M. P. S. (2022). From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015

Cantor A. (2021). Hydrosocial hinterlands: An urban political ecology of Southern California’s hydrosocial territory // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620909384

Castells M. (1999). Grassrooting the space of flows // Urban Geography. Vol. 20. № 4. P. 294–302. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294

Couldry N., Ali Me U. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism // Culture and Economic Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1718835

Cronon W. (1995). The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. New York: W.W. Norton.

Dong Z., Shen H., Zhang W., Wu R., Wang S. (2022). How does resource dependence relate cities’ technology diversification? The role of density and complexity // Cities. Vol. 130. P. 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103883

Donoghoe M. (2023). Intimate extraction: Geological matter, extractive afterlives, and the denial of a Black sense of place in Southern Louisiana // Area. Vol. 55. №. 4. P. 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12847

Dunlap A., Jakobsen J. (2020). The Violent Technologies of Extraction. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Dunlap A., Riquito M. (2023). Social warfare for lithium extraction? Open-pit lithium mining, counterinsurgency tactics and enforcing green extractivism in northern Portugal // Energy Research & Social Science. vol. 95. p. 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102912

Durante F., Kröger M., LaFleur W. (2021). Extraction and extractivisms // Our extractive age: expressions of violence and resistance / J. Shapiro, J.-A. McNeish eds. New York, NY: Routledge. P. 19–30. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127611-3

Ehrnström-Fuentes M., Kröger M. (2018). Birthing extractivism: The role of the state in forestry politics and development in Uruguay // Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 57. P. 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.022

Eilenberg M. (2014). Frontier constellations: agrarian expansion and sovereignty on the Indonesian-Malaysian border // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 41. № 2. P. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.885433

Elden S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 34. № 6. P. 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603

Fash B. C. (2022). Redefining extractivism from Honduras // Geoforum. Vol. 135. P. 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.07.010

Franz T., McNelly A. (2023). The ‘Finance-Extraction-Transitions Nexus’: Towards A Critical Research Agenda Exploring the Scramble for Transition Minerals // London: SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series. № 257.

Frederiksen T., Himley M. (2020). Tactics of dispossession: Access, power, and subjectivity at the extractive frontier // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 45. № 1. P. 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12329

Furlong K. (2021). Geographies of infrastructure II: Concrete, cloud and layered (in) visibilities // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 45. № 1. P. 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520923098

Gómez-Barris M. (2017). The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.5070/t491044224

Gudynas E. (2018). Extractivisms. Tendencies and consequences // Reframing Latin American Development / R. Munck, R. Delgado Wise eds. New York, NY: Routledge. P. 61–76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170084-4

Gustafsson M.-T., Scurrah M. (2019). Unpacking the extractivist state: The role of weak state agencies in promoting institutional change in Peru // The Extractive Industries and Society. vol. 6. № 1. P. 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.007

Harvey D. (2005). The New Imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hernandez D. S., Newell P. (2022). Oro blanco: assembling extractivism in the lithium triangle // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 49. № 5. P. 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2080061

Holz Y. R. (2023). Threatened sustainability: extractivist tendencies in the forest-based bioeconomy in Finland // Sustainability Science. Vol. 18. P. 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01300-9

Hougaard I.-M., Vélez-Torres I. (2020). Shifting sands: Legal dispossession of small-scale miners in an extractivist era // Geoforum. Vol. 115. P. 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.022

Johnson A., Zalik A., Sharlene M., Sultana F, Havice E., Osborne T., Valdivia G., Lu F., Billo E. (2021). Extraction, entanglements, and (im)materialities: Reflections on the methods and methodologies of natural resource industries fieldwork // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 383–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620907470

Kay P. (2022). Contemporary dynamics of agrarian change / eds. H. Veltmeyer, P. Bowles. New York, NY: Routledge.

Keighren I. M., Abrahamsson C., Della Dora V. (2012). On canonical geographies // Dialogues in Human Geography. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612468534

Keith M., Birch E., Buchould N. J. A., Cardama M., Cobbett W., Cohen M., Elmquist T., Espey J., Hajer M., Hartmann G. (2022). A new urban narrative for sustainable development // Nature Sustainability. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00979-5

Kelly A. B., Peluso N. L. (2015). Frontiers of Commodification: State Lands and Their Formalization // Society & Natural Resources. Vol. 28. № 5. P. 473–495.

Knuth S. (2016). Seeing Green in San Francisco: City as Resource Frontier // Antipode. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12205

Koch N., Perreault T. (2019). Resource nationalism // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 43. № 4. P. 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518781497

Kröger M., Nygren A. (2020). Shifting frontier dynamics in Latin America // Journal of Agrarian Change. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12354

Kröger M. (2020). Iron Will: Global Extractivism and Mining Resistance in Brazil and India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2060296

Kröger M. (2022). Extractivisms, existences and extinctions: Monoculture plantations and Amazon deforestation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102977-1

Laastad S. G. (2022). Mapping terrains of struggle: State space and the spatiality of oil mobilisation in Ecuador and Peru // Geoforum. Vol. 137. P. 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.10.002

Laing A. F. (2020). Re-producing territory: Between resource nationalism and indigenous self-determination in Bolivia // Geoforum. Vol. 108. P. 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.015

Lally N., Kay K., Thatcher J. (2022). Computational parasites and hydropower: A political ecology of Bitcoin mining on the Columbia River // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619867608

Luke T. W. (2019). Las Vegas as the Anthropocene: The Neoliberal City as Desertification All the Way Down // The Challenge of Progress: Volume 36 / ed. H. F. Dahms. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0278-120420190000036020

Malone A., Smith N. M., Zeballos Zeballos E. (2021). Coexistence and conflict between artisanal mining, fishing, and farming in a Peruvian boomtown // Geoforum. Vol. 120. P. 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.012

Mármol C., Vaccaro I. (2020). New extractivism in European rural areas: How twentieth first century mining returned to disturb the rural transition // Geoforum. Vol. 116. P. 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.012

McKay B. M., Alonso-Fradejas A., Ezquerro-Cañete A. (eds.) (2021). Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367822958

McKay B. M. (2020). Food sovereignty and neo-extractivism: limits and possibilities of an alternative development model // Globalizations. Vol. 17. № 8. P. 1386–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1691798

McNeill D. (2015). Global firms and smart technologies: IBM and the reduction of cities // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 40. № 4. P. 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12098

McNeill D. (2022). Urban geography II: Materially important cities // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 46. № 5. P. 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221104819

Mejia-Muñoz S., Babidge S. (2023). Lithium extractivism: perpetuating historical asymmetries in the ‘Green economy’ // Third World Quarterly. Vol. 44. № 6. P. 1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2176298

Merino R. (2020). The cynical state: forging extractivism, neoliberalism and development in governmental spaces // Third World Quarterly. vol. 41. № 1. P. 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264

Mezzadra S., Neilson B. (2017). On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism // Cultural Studies. Vol. 31. № 2–3. P. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425

Moore J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London, UK: Verso.

Moore S. A. (2020). Individuation through infrastructure: data extraction and the academic publishing oligopoly // Journal of Documentation. Vol. 77. № 1. P. 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0090

Murrey A., Mollett S. (2023). Extraction is not a metaphor: Decolonial and Black Geographies against the gendered and embodied violence of extractive logics // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 48. № 4. P. 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12610

Myadar O., Jackson S. (2019). Contradictions of Populism and Resource Extraction: Examining the Intersection of Resource Nationalism and Accumulation by Dispossession in Mongolia // Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Vol. 109. № 2. P. 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1500233

Nixon R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Noroña M. B. (2022). Extractive governmentality, ethnic territories, and racial imaginaries in the northern Amazon of Ecuador // Geoforum. Vol. 128. P. 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.023

Nygren A., Kröger M., Gills B. (2022). Global extractivisms and transformative alternatives // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 734–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069495

Ollinaho O. I., Kröger M. (2021). Agroforestry transitions: The good, the bad and the ugly // Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 82. P. 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.016

Parks J. (2021). The poetics of extractivism and the politics of visibility // Textual Practice. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2021.1886708

Ricaurte P. (2019). Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance // Television & New Media. Vol. 20. № 4. P. 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640

Riofrancos T. (2020). Resource radicals: from Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivisms in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975623000127

Sadowski J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction // Big Data & Society. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 205395171882054. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549

Sadowski J. (2020). The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism // Antipode. Vol. 52. № 2. P. 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595

Sassen S. (2001). The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Semple E. C. (1911). Influences of Geographic Environment, on the Basis of Ratzel’s System of Anthropogeography. New York: Henry Holt.

Sholz T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, New York Office.

Smith G. M. (2023). Blighted Futures: The Soybean Assemblage and Argentina’s Agro-extractive Turn // Geoforum. Vol. 141. P. 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103717

Streule M. (2023). Urban extractivism. Contesting megaprojects in Mexico City, rethinking urban values // Urban Geography. Vol. 44. № 1. P. 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2146931

Svampa M. (2019). Neo-Extractivism in Latin America Socio-Environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108752589

Szeman I., Wenzel J. (2021). What do we talk about when we talk about extractivism? // Textual practice. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2021.1889829

Teran Mantovani E. (2016). Las nuevas fronteras de las commodities en Venezuela: extractivismo, crisis histórica y disputas territoriales // Ciencia Política. Vol. 11. № 21. P. 251–285. https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.60296

Thoyre A. (2021). Negawatt resource frontiers: Extracting energy efficiency from private spaces // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 1703–1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620970128

Tironi Rodo M., Valderrama Barragán M. (2023). From copper mining to data extractivism? Data worth making at Chile’s Data Observatory Foundation // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 41. № 3. P. 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231183719

Tornel C. (2023). Energy justice in the context of green extractivism: Perpetuating ontological and epistemological violence in the Yucatan Peninsula // Journal of Political Ecology. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5485

Tsing A. L. (2003). Natural Resources and Capitalist Frontiers // Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 38. № 48. P. 5100–5106.

Turner F. J. (1920). The Significance of the Frontier in American History. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Usher M. (2020). Territory incognita // Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 44. № 6. P. 1019–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519879492

Veltmeyer H., Záyago Lao E. (2020). Buen Vivir and the Challenges to Capitalism in Latin America. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091516

Verbrugge B., Geenen S. (2019). The gold commodity frontier: A fresh perspective on change and diversity in the global gold mining economy // The Extractive Industries and Society. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.10.014

Voskoboynik D. M., Andreucci D. (2022). Greening extractivism: Environmental discourses and resource governance in the ‘Lithium Triangle’ // Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211006345

Ye J., Ploeg J. D., Shneider S., Shanin T. (2020). The incursions of extractivism: moving from dispersed places to global capitalism // The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1559834

Опубликован
2024-03-24
Как цитировать
ПанфиловН., & ДоховР. (2024). Не только природные ресурсы: экстрактивизм как обобщающая концепция. Социологическое обозрение, 23(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-2-340-363
Раздел
Обзоры