Социальное восприятие искусственного интеллекта в Twitter: сравнительное исследование стран Глобального Юга и Глобального Севера
Аннотация
Это исследование изучает социальное восприятие ChatGPT в Twitter, сравнивая подходы в странах Глобального Юга (Индия и Турция) и Глобального Севера (Великобритания и США). Используется подход «текст как данные», включающий анализ тональности высказываний, анализ текста и тематическое моделирование твитов на английском языке, содержащих слово «ChatGPT», собранных в период с 1 января по 1 июня 2023 года. Для анализа тональности применяется словарь тональности VADER, а для текстового анализа и тематического моделирования используются n-граммы и BERTopic соответственно. Анализ тональности выявляет в целом позитивное восприятие ChatGPT в обоих регионах, хотя также выражаются опасения по поводу возможных негативных последствий. Текстовый анализ и тематическое моделирование показывают, что дискуссии сосредоточены вокруг крупных технологических компаний и ведущих фигур, при этом страны Глобального Севера больше акцентируют внимание на отраслевом применении и технических аспектах, тогда как Глобальный Юг оценивает ChatGPT в контексте местных языков и культур. Результаты исследования демонстрируют, что социокультурные различия и межрегиональные уровни технологического развития отражаются и в социальном восприятии ChatGPT. Исследование вносит вклад в понимание раннего восприятия генеративного искусственного интеллекта и подчеркивает важность учета вопросов конфиденциальности, разработки культурно совместимых решений и изучения потенциального влияния ChatGPT в различных областях.Скачивания
Литература
Abdelghani R., Wang Y. H., Yuan X. et al. (2024) GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents to train children’s curious question-asking skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 34, no 3, pp. 483–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00340-7
Aktay S., Gok S., Uzunoglu D. (2023) ChatGPT in Education. TAY Journal, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 378-406.
Archibugi D., Pietrobelli C. (2003) The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden? Technological forecasting and social change, vol. 70, no 9, pp. 861-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1625(02)00409-2
Baptista J., Costa D., Gonçalves S. P. (2023) Social Representations of Trans People in the Workplace. Social Sciences, vol. 12, no 8, p. 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080449
Barrie C., Ho J. (2021) academictwitteR: An R package to access the Twitter Academic Research Product Track v2 API endpoint. Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 6, no 62, p. 3272. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03272
Bayad A., Sakin D., Cesur S. (2020) Orta Öğretim Öğrencilerinde Barışın Sosyal Temsilleri. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, vol. 36, no 88. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320200705x000037
Benoit K. (2020) Text as data: An overview. The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations (L. Curini & R. Franzese eds.), London: Sage, pp. 461–497. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387.n29
Benoit K., Watanabe K., Wang H., Nulty P., Obeng A., Müller S., Matsuo A. (2018) quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 3, no 30, p. 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
Bharathi Mohan G., Prasanna Kumar R., Parathasarathy S., Aravind S., Hanish K.B., Pavithria G. (2023) Text Summarization for Big Data Analytics: A Comprehensive Review of GPT 2 and BERT Approaches. Data Analytics for Internet of Things Infrastructure. Internet of Things (R. Sharma, G. Jeon, Y. Zhang eds.), Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33808-3_14
Boyles J. L., Weber M. S., Borges-Rey E. (2024) In Code We Trust? Assessing Code’s Role as a Mediator of Power and Ethics Within Journalistic Practice. Digital Journalism, vol. 12, no 7, pp. 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2395478
Cai Q., Lin Y., Yu Z. (2023) Factors Influencing Learner Attitudes Towards ChatGPT-Assisted Language Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no 22, pp. 7112–7126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5315763
Cai W. (2022) Environment, Aesthetics, Technology, and Gentrification from Global North to Global South: An Integrated Review of Literature. Journal of Smart Cities, vol. 7, no 1, pp. 5-12. https://doi.org/10.26789/jsc.2022.01.002
Çakıcı Z. (2020) Uluslararası dijital medyada bir sosyal temsil olarak Aylan Kurdi haberleri (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Galatasaray Üniversitesi.
Calma J. (2023) Twitter just closed the book on academic research—The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/31/23739084/twitter-elon-musk-api-policy-chilling-academic-research (accessed 10 July 2024)
Carpenter D., Min W., Lee S., Ozogul G., Zheng X., Lester J. (2024) Assessing Student Explanations with Large Language Models Using Fine-Tuning and Few-Shot Learning, pp. 403–413.
Cirhinlioğlu F. G., Aktaş V., Öner Özkan B. (2006) Sosyal temsil kuramına genel bir bakış.
Creswell A., White T., Dumoulin V., Arulkumaran K., Sengupta B., Bharath A. A. (2018) Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 35, no 1, pp. 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2017.2765202
Dahal B., Kumar S. A. P., Li Z. (2019) Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets. Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 9, no 1, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8
Demirel S., Bulur N., Çakıcı Z. (2024a) Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Text Classification in Communication Sciences: Reliability of ChatGPT Models in Turkish Texts. Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics (D. Darwish ed.), IGI Global, pp. 218–235. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1830-0.ch013
Demirel S., Kahraman E., Gündüz U. (2024b) A text mining analysis of the change in status of the Hagia Sophia on Twitter: The political discourse and its reflections on the public opinion. Atlantic Journal of Communication, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2022.2093354
DiMaggio P., Nag M., Blei D. (2013) Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, vol. 41, no 6, pp. 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
Doise W. (2002) Les représentations sociales: Leçons du passé et défis d’aujourd’hui. Social Science Information, vol. 41, no 1, pp. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041001007
Durkheim E. (2014) Sosyolojik yöntemin kuralları (Ö. Doğan, Trans.). Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Duveen G., Lloyd B. (1986) The significance of social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00728.x
Fabian T. (2023) The Cool Runnings Effect: Flexible Citizenship, the Global South, and Transcultural Republics at the Winter Olympic Games. The Olympic Winter Games at 100). Routledge, pp. 58-83. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032623207-5
Farr R. M., Markova I. (1995) Professional and lay representations of health, illness and handicap: A theoretical overview. Representations of Health, Illness and Handicap, pp. 93–110.
Feuerriegel S., Hartmann J., Janiesch C., Zschech P. (2024) Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 66, no 1, pp. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Flacher D., Graña J. M., Rikap C. (2024) Industry 4.0: a global North, global South perspective. Revue d'économie industrielle, no 185, pp. 11-15. https://doi.org/10.4000/12k1u
Floridi L., Chiriatti M. (2020) GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, no 30, pp. 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Fütterer T., Fischer C., Alekseeva A., Chen X., Tate T., Warschauer M., Gerjets P. (2023) ChatGPT in education: Global reactions to AI innovations. Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no 1, p. 15310. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2840105/v1
Gilson A., Safranek C. W., Huang T., Socrates V., Chi L., Taylor R. A., Chartash D. (2023) How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Medical Education, no 9, p. e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
Golan O., Milliken A. (2024) Turing’s Enigma: Laying the Groundwork for AI.
Gondwe G. (2023) CHATGPT and the Global South: how are journalists in sub-Saharan Africa engaging with generative AI?. Online Media and Global Communication, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0023
Goodfellow I., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., Xu B., Warde-Farley D., Ozair S., Courville A., Bengio Y. (2020) Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no 11, pp. 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622
Gordon R. E. (2022) Development disrupted: the Global South in the twenty-first century, Cambridge University Press.
Gräbner-Radkowitsch C., Strunk B. (2023) Degrowth and the Global South: The twin problem of global dependencies. Ecological Economics, no 213, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107946
Grimmer J., Stewart B. M. (2013) Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, vol. 21, no 3, pp. 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
Grootendorst M. (2022) BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2203.05794. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.bertopicr
Gültekin S. (2022) Social Representation Theory and Tourism. Routledge Handbook of Social Psychology of Tourism, Routledge, pp. 68–75 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161868-7
Gündüz U., Demirel S. (2023) Metaverse-related perceptions and sentiments on Twitter: Evidence from text mining and network analysis. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09745-x
Günther E., Quandt T. (2016) Word Counts and Topic Models: Automated text analysis methods for digital journalism research. Digital Journalism, vol. 4, no 1, pp. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093270
Haelewaters D., Hofmann T. A., Romero-Olivares A. L. (2021) Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South. PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 17, no 8, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277
Haralambous Y., Lenca P. (2023) Beyond the Semantic Web: Towards an Implicit Pragmatic Web and a Web of Social Representations. Future Internet, vol. 15, no 7, p. 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15070239
Haswell F., Edelenbosch O. Y., Piscicelli L., van Vuuren D. P. (2024) The geography of circularity missions: A cross-country comparison of circular economy policy approaches in the Global North and Global South. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 52, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100883
Hutto C., Gilbert E. (2014) VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
Hvitfeldt E., Silge J. (2022) Supervised machine learning for text analysis in R, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Ishida T., Ihsan A. F., Rudawan R. A. (2024) Advancing Global South University Education with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07139.
Jang S. H., Jung G. (2021) How does COVID-19 differ from the flu/cold? A study of multilevel information seeking among Korean immigrant women in the US. American Journal of Health Behavior, vol. 45, no 4, pp. 665–676. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.45.4.6
Jo T. (2019) Text Mining—Concepts, Implementation, and Big Data Challenge (1st ed.), Cham: Springer.
Jónsson E., Stolee J. (2015) An evaluation of topic modelling techniques for twitter, University of Toronto.
Justo A. M., da Silva Bousfield A. B., Giacomozzi A. I., Camargo B. V. (2020) Communication, social representations and prevention-information polarization on COVID-19 in Brazil. Papers on Social Representations, vol. 29, no 2, pp. 4–1.
Kahraman E., Demirel S., Gündüz U. (2023) COVID-19 vaccines in twitter ecosystem: Analyzing perceptions and attitudes by sentiment and text analysis method. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02078-x
Kasneci E., Sessler K., Küchemann S., Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., Gasser U., Groh G., Günnemann S., Hüllermeier E., Krusche S., Kutyniok G., Michaeli T., Nerdel C., Pfeffer J., Poquet O., Sailer M., Schmidt A., Seidel T., … Kasneci G. (2023) ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, no 103, p. 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Keiper M. C. (2023) ChatGPT in practice: Increasing event planning efficiency through artificial intelligence. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, no 33, p. 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100454
Klinger U., Kreiss D., Mutsvairo B. (2023) Platforms, Power, and Politics: A Model for an Ever-changing Field. Political Communication Report, no 27.
Koonchanok R., Pan Y., Jang H. (2023) Public Attitudes Toward ChatGPT on Twitter: Sentiments, Topics, and Occupations. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3945065/v1
Koonchanok R., Pan Y., Jang H. (2024) Public attitudes toward chatgpt on twitter: Sentiments, topics, and occupations. Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 14, no 1, p. 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01260-7
Koskinen K., Bonina C., Eaton B. (2019) Digital platforms in the global south: foundations and research agenda. In Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D: 15th IFIP WG 9.4 International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, ICT4D 2019, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, May 1–3, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 15, Springer International Publishing, pp. 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_26
Kumar A., Kumar L. (2024) Navigating the Future: The Ethical, Societal and Technological Implications of Artificial Intelligence. Journal Homepage: Https://Gjrpublication. Com/Gjrecs, no 4(02).
Kumar S. (2024) Trends of exports of high technology products from Global South. Development Cooperation Review, vol. 7, no 1, p. 51.
Leal D. F., Harder N. L. (2021) Global dynamics of international migration systems across South–South, North–North, and North–South flows, 1990–2015. Applied Network Science, no 6, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00322-x
Li W., Haunert J., Knechtel J., Zhu J., Zhu Q., Dehbi Y. (2023) Social media insights on public perception and sentiment during and after disasters: The European floods in 2021 as a case study. Transactions in GIS, vol. 27, no 6, pp. 1766-1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13097
Li W., Su Z., Li R., Zhang K., Wang Y. (2020) Blockchain-based data security for artificial intelligence applications in 6G networks. IEEE Network, vol. 34, no 6, pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/mnet.021.1900629
Lin T. C. (2019) Artificial intelligence, finance, and the law. Fordham L. Rev., no 88, p. 531.
Liu B. (2020) Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions (Second edition), Cambridge university press.
Lucas C., Nielsen R. A., Roberts M. E., Stewart B. M., Storer A., Tingley D. (2015) Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics. Political Analysis, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu019
Malczewski E. (2019) Durkheim and the Nation. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 39, no 1, pp. 41–64.
Martikainen J. (2020) Visual representations of teachership: A social representations approach.
McCarthy J., Minsky M. L., Rochester N., Shannon C. E. (2006) A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955. AI Magazine, vol. 27, no 4, pp. 12–12.
Meyer J. (2018) Restructuring the Christian Fatherhood Model: A practical theological investigation into the ‘male problematic’of father absence. HTS: Theological Studies, vol. 74, no 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i1.4870
Molosi-France K., Makoni S. (2020) A partnership of un-equals: global south–north research collaborations in higher education institutions. Modern Africa: Politics, History and Society, vol. 8, no 2, pp. 9-24. https://doi.org/10.26806/modafr.v8i2.343
Moreira L., Paiva J. C., Morais C. (2021) The social representations of the Internet: A systematic review of literature towards a groundbreaking research agenda. Papers on Social Representations, vol. 30, no 1, p. 1–1.
Moscovici S. (1963) Attitudes and Opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 231–260.
Mudaly R., Chirikure T. (2023, October) STEM education in the Global North and Global South: Competition, conformity, and convenient collaborations. Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, p. 1144399. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1144399
Müller M. (2018) In Search of the Global East: Thinking between North and South. Geopolitics, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757
Nedbal C., Naik N., Castellani D., Gahuar V., Geraghty R., Somani B. K. (2023) ChatGPT in urology practice: Revolutionizing efficiency and patient care with generative artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001151
Nisch S. (2024) Public opinion about Finland joining NATO: Analysing Twitter posts by performing natural language processing. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 272-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2235565
Novikova I., Berezina E., Sachkova M., Dvoryanchikov N., Novikov A., Bovina I. (2024) To Be Scared or Not to Be Scared: Social Representations of COVID-19 in Young People (A Cross-Cultural Study). Social Sciences, vol. 13, no 1, p. 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010062
Ogoro M., Minescu A., Moriarty M. (2022) Cultural Identity in Bicultural Young Adults in Ireland: A Social Representation Theory Approach. Social Sciences, vol. 11, no 6, p. 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060230
Oliński M., Krukowski K., Sieciński K. (2024) Bibliometric Overview of ChatGPT: New Perspectives in Social Sciences. Publications, vol. 12, no 1, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12010009
Öner B. (2002) SOSYAL TEMSİLLER. Kriz Dergisi, 029–035. https://doi.org/10.1501/kriz_0000000179
Pang B., Lee L. (2008) Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, vol. 2, no 1–2, pp. 1–135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
Paul K., Milmo D. (2022, October 28) Elon Musk completes Twitter takeover and ‘fires top executives.’ The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/27/elon-musk-completes-twitter-takeover (accessed 10 July 2024) https://doi.org/10.64628/aam.xaannqdum
Pineda P., Mishra S. (2023) The semantics of diversity in higher education: differences between the Global North and Global South. Higher Education, vol. 85, no 4, pp. 865-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00870-4
Polli G. M., Camargo B. V. (2015) Social Representations of the Environment in Press Media. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), vol. 25, no 61, pp. 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272561201514
Portes Virginio F., Stewart P., Garvey B. (2023) Unpacking super-exploitation in the 21st century: The struggles of Haitian workers in Brazil. Work, Employment and Society, vol. 37, no 4, pp. 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211060748
Pozzi F. A., Fersini E., Messina E., Liu, B. (2017) Challenges of Sentiment Analysis in Social Networks. Sentiment Analysis in Social Networks. Elsevier, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804412-4.00001-2
Qi W., Pan J., Lyu H., Luo J. (2024) Excitements and concerns in the post-ChatGPT era: Deciphering public perception of AI through social media analysis. Telematics and Informatics, no 92, p. 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158
Qin X., Huang M., Ding J. (2024) AITurk: Using ChatGPT for social science research. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4922861
Quinn K. M., Monroe B. L., Colaresi M., Crespin M. H., Radev D. R. (2010) How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no 1, pp. 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rabitz F., Telešienė A., Zolubienė E. (2021) Topic modelling the news media representation of climate change. Environmental Sociology, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2020.1866281
Ramage D., Rosen E., Chuang J., Manning C. D., McFarland D. A. (2009) Topic modeling for the social sciences, vol. 5, no 27, pp. 1–4.
Ribeiro F. N., Araújo M., Gonçalves P., André Gonçalves M., Benevenuto F. (2016) SentiBench—A benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, vol. 5, no 1, p. 23. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
Rovamo H., Sakki I. (2024) Lay representations of populism: Discursive negotiation of naturalized social representation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 34, no 1, p. e2755. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2755
Ruan T., Lv Q. (2022) Public perception of electric vehicles on reddit over the past decade. Communications in Transportation Research, no 2, p. 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100070
Saleh S. N., McDonald S. A., Basit M. A., Kumar,S., Arasaratnam R. J., Perl T. M., Lehmann C. U., Medford R. J. (2023) Public perception of COVID-19 vaccines through analysis of Twitter content and users. Vaccine, vol. 41, no 33, pp. 4844-4853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.058
Schembri P., Petit O. (2009) Clean technology transfers and North-South technological gap: An important issue for environmental policies. Économie internationale, vol. 120, no 4, pp. 109-129. https://doi.org/10.3917/ecoi.120.0109
Silge J., Robinson D. (2017) Text mining with R: A tidy approach, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Singh H., Tayarani-Najaran M.-H., Yaqoob M. (2023b) Exploring Computer Science Students’ Perception of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Descriptive and Correlation Study. Education Sciences, vol. 13, no 9, p. 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090924
Singh S. K., Kumar S., Mehra P. S. (2023a) Chat gpt & google bard ai: A review, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icicat57735.2023.10263706
Smejkalová T. (2024) Legal Concepts as Social Representations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, vol. 37, no 1, pp. 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10066-3
Souza L. G. S., O’Dwyer E., Coutinho S. M. dos S., Chaudhuri S., Rocha L. L., Souza L. P. de. (2021) Social representations and ideology: Theories of common sense about COVID-19 among middle-class Brazilians and their ideological implications. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, vol. 9, no 1, pp. 105–122. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6069
Sovacool B. K. (2023) Expanding carbon removal to the Global South: Thematic concerns on systems, justice, and climate governance. Energy and Climate Change, no 4, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100103
Sultana F. (2023) Whose growth in whose planetary boundaries? Decolonising planetary justice in the Anthropocene. Geo: Geography and Environment, vol. 10, no 2, p. e00128. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.128
Tarisayi K. S. (2024) ChatGPT use in universities in South Africa through a socio-technical lens. Cogent Education, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 2295654. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2295654
Tian S., Jin Q., Yeganova L., Lai P.-T., Zhu Q., Chen X., Yang Y., Chen Q., Kim W., Comeau D. C., Islamaj R., Kapoor A., Gao X., Lu Z. (2024) Opportunities and challenges for ChatGPT and large language models in biomedicine and health. Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no 1, Article bbad493. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad493
Tong J., Zuo L. (2021) Social Representations of the EU Referendum on Twitter. The Brexit Referendum on Twitter: A Mixed-Method, Computational Analysis. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-294-920211009
Tureček P., Kleisner K. (2022) Symptomic Mimicry Between SARS-CoV-2 and the Common Cold Complex. Biosemiotics, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09472-6
Turing A. M. (1950) I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE. Mind, LIX, no 236, pp. 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lix.236.433
Verma M. (2023) Artificial intelligence role in modern science: Aims, merits, risks and its applications. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, no 5.
Wang K., Variengien A., Conmy A., Shlegeris B., Steinhardt J. (2022) Interpretability in the wild: A circuit for indirect object identification in GPT-2 small. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2211.00593. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.00593
Wang W., Siau K. (2019) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, robotics, future of work and future of humanity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Database Management (JDM), vol. 30, no 1, pp. 61–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2019010104
Welbers K., Van Atteveldt W., Benoit K. (2017) Text Analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1387238
Wiedemann G. (2016) Text mining for qualitative data analysis in the social sciences, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Woschank M., Rauch E., Zsifkovits H. (2020) A review of further directions for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in smart logistics. Sustainability, vol. 12, no 9, p. 3760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093760
X/Twitter: Global audience 2024. (2024) Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/ (accessed 10 July 2024)
Yin H., Song X., Yang S., Li J. (2022). Sentiment analysis and topic modeling for COVID-19 vaccine discussions. World Wide Web, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-022-01029-y
Yu H. (2023) Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, p. 1181712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
Zengele T., Pitsoe V. J. (2023) Moscovici and Schon on Quality Assurance in Open Distance Learning. Available at SSRN 4497228. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4497228
Zhai W., Hu W., Yuan Z., Li Y. (2024) Examining disaster resilience perception of social media users during the billion-dollar hurricanes. Natural Hazards, vol. 120, no 1, pp. 701-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06206-4
Zhang L., Liu B. (2017) Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining (C. Sammut, G. I. Webb eds.), US Springer, pp. 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907
Zhao J., Liu K., Xu L. (2016) Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Computational Linguistics, vol. 42, no 3, pp. 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_r_00259
Zheng X., Zhang C., Woodland P. C. (2021, December) Adapting GPT, GPT-2 and BERT language models for speech recognition. 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU). IEEE. pp. 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/asru51503.2021.9688232
Zhong B. (2023). Going beyond fact-checking to fight health misinformation: A multi-level analysis of the Twitter response to health news stories. International Journal of Information Management, no 70, p. 102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102626
Zolnoori M., Huang M., Patten C. A., Balls-Berry J. E., Goudarzvand S., Brockman T. A., Sagheb E., Yao L. (2021) Mining news media for understanding public health concerns. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 5, no 1, p. e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.434
Zou W., Li J., Yang Y., Tang L. (2023) Exploring the Early Adoption of Open AI among Laypeople and Technical Professionals: An Analysis of Twitter Conversations on #ChatGPT and #GPT3. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2295725
Zubiaga A., Procter R., Maple C. (2018) A longitudinal analysis of the public perception of the opportunities and challenges of the Internet of Things. PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no 12, p. e0209472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209472
