TY  - JOUR
TI  - Max Weber’s Theory of Causality: An Examination on the Resistance to Post-Truth
T2  - The Russian Sociological Review
IS  - The Russian Sociological Review
KW  - Max Weber
KW  - Johannes von Kries
KW  - causality
KW  - objective possibility
KW  - event
KW  - subjective meaning
KW  - post-truth
AB  - Post-truth as a form of epistemological democracy (Fuller, 2018) is a fight for authority between equal explanatory models with epistemological methods. What should a disciplinary reaction of sociology be to the dawn of post-truth? We are to re-investigate models of causal imputation within the domain of sociology in order to eliminate not any particular "bad" judgments of post-truth, but their logical forms. Max Weber spent at least five years developing a consistent theory of causation for sociology. To build his complex theoretical apparatus of causal imputation, Weber used the ideas of Johannes von Kries, a German psychologist and a philosopher of science. Because of logical vulnerabilities of von Kries’s theory, both Weberian models of causal imputation can lead to the emergence of at least two forms of illegitimate judgments. However, Weber was not only mistaken but he also succeeded. The reading of his second model of causation, the "chance causation," can contribute to the debates over the notion of the subjective meaning in Weber’s interpretative sociology.
AU  - Konstantin Gaaze
UR  - https://sociologica.hse.ru/en/2019-18-2/291833936.html
PY  - 2019
SP  - 41-61
VL  - 18