@ARTICLE{27043461_28142675_2009, 
	author = {Alexey Gusev}, 
	keywords = {, migration, marginality, social identity, national state, mobility, marginalization, the stranger, cosmopolitanism, tourismspatial movements},
	title = {Marginalization and cosmopolitanism: contemporary views on social consequences of spatial relocation intensification},
	journal = {The Russian Sociological Review},
	year = {2009},
	volume = {8},
	number = {2},
	pages = {72-79},
	url = {https://sociologica.hse.ru/en/2009-8-2/28142675.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {The contemporary sociologists' views on such issues as social identification diffusion, marginalization and decadence of national states are the subject of a current paper. Author's point of view is a bit unusual: all the above-mentioned processes are analyzed as consequences of movement in a physical space; however, the movement is no doubt a social fact (but not geographic or physical). The order of sociologists' positions examining is logical: first examined author is Zygmunt Bauman, whose works unveil the most abstract and ontological foundations of the marginalization process. Anthony Giddens and Ulrich Beck are the next: the level of their theoretical constructions is a bit more grounded. The paper is finalized with the John Urry's views analysis: his mobile sociology is crucial in the frame of current topic, however, theoretically distant from previous sociologists.},
	annote = {The contemporary sociologists' views on such issues as social identification diffusion, marginalization and decadence of national states are the subject of a current paper. Author's point of view is a bit unusual: all the above-mentioned processes are analyzed as consequences of movement in a physical space; however, the movement is no doubt a social fact (but not geographic or physical). The order of sociologists' positions examining is logical: first examined author is Zygmunt Bauman, whose works unveil the most abstract and ontological foundations of the marginalization process. Anthony Giddens and Ulrich Beck are the next: the level of their theoretical constructions is a bit more grounded. The paper is finalized with the John Urry's views analysis: his mobile sociology is crucial in the frame of current topic, however, theoretically distant from previous sociologists.}
}