@ARTICLE{27043461_27481178_2006, 
	author = {Alexey Gusev}, 
	keywords = {, underclass, Chicago school, deviation, marginality, inner cities, ethnic minorities, exclusionwelfare state},
	title = {Modern underclass theories and Chicago School marginality concepts: theoretical comparison},
	journal = {The Russian Sociological Review},
	year = {2006},
	volume = {5},
	number = {1},
	pages = {102-113},
	url = {https://sociologica.hse.ru/en/2006-5-1/27481178.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {Current article includes comparative analysis of contemporary lower strata studies and classical Chicago school studies devoted to the same topic. In the beginning contemporary underclass concepts are examined: their sources, key theoretical constructions, explanations of this strata existence. Direct comparison with Chicago scholars’ standpoints based on four key parameters: welfare programs interdependence; emphasis on race and ethnic minorities’ problems; "inner city" territorial isolation; disposition towards deviation. Another important idea of the whole article is principal similarity of theoretical tasks through different epochs regardless historical differences of the empiric object.},
	annote = {Current article includes comparative analysis of contemporary lower strata studies and classical Chicago school studies devoted to the same topic. In the beginning contemporary underclass concepts are examined: their sources, key theoretical constructions, explanations of this strata existence. Direct comparison with Chicago scholars’ standpoints based on four key parameters: welfare programs interdependence; emphasis on race and ethnic minorities’ problems; "inner city" territorial isolation; disposition towards deviation. Another important idea of the whole article is principal similarity of theoretical tasks through different epochs regardless historical differences of the empiric object.}
}