@ARTICLE{27043461_27480648_2006, 
	author = {Viktor Vakhshtayn}, 
	keywords = {, Goffman, sociology of everydaylife, practice, frame, frame-analysispractice turn},
	title = {Sociology of everyday life: from practice to frame. Book review: Erving Goffman. Frame Analysis. M.: Institute of Sociology RAS, 2003},
	journal = {The Russian Sociological Review},
	year = {2006},
	volume = {5},
	number = {1},
	pages = {69-75},
	url = {https://sociologica.hse.ru/en/2006-5-1/27480648.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {Interest in everyday life has been rekindled in modern social theory under the influence of «practice turn». In a series of popular theoretical works the notion «practice» pretends to have the status of a universal explanatory category, and everyday life is interpreted as an intersection of more or less structured flows of interaction. However, there is a hidden distinction behind this «more or less» view, which is ignored by the «practice turn» adherents. Switching over from segments of activity to a form of their organization, and consistent study of structure and syntax of interaction bring about an alternative «non-practical» logic of comprehending everyday reality. This logic is traditionally connected with the late works of Erving Goffman and, particularly, his theory of frames. The article presents a review of Goffman’s cult book «Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience», which caused development of frame-analysis in sociology of everyday life.},
	annote = {Interest in everyday life has been rekindled in modern social theory under the influence of «practice turn». In a series of popular theoretical works the notion «practice» pretends to have the status of a universal explanatory category, and everyday life is interpreted as an intersection of more or less structured flows of interaction. However, there is a hidden distinction behind this «more or less» view, which is ignored by the «practice turn» adherents. Switching over from segments of activity to a form of their organization, and consistent study of structure and syntax of interaction bring about an alternative «non-practical» logic of comprehending everyday reality. This logic is traditionally connected with the late works of Erving Goffman and, particularly, his theory of frames. The article presents a review of Goffman’s cult book «Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience», which caused development of frame-analysis in sociology of everyday life.}
}